Weekly Comedian Book Evaluate
The Story: Aquaman shouldn’t be going to be clapping and exclaiming “Hercules” after this.
The Evaluation: If I can distill the distinction between Parker’s Aquaman and Geoff John’s Aquaman to some, pithy words, it’s the lack of the title’s epic high quality. There’s no longer the sense that we’re reading a run for the ages, but slightly a more typical superhero collection. That’s not a foul change, precisely; as a substitute of decompressed, measured storytelling, we’ve got adventures that feel extra spontaneous and bombastic. After enduring so many deep, broad-ranging conflicts, Aquaman deserves to perhaps coast slightly.
This brawn-on-brawn battle with Hercules certainly matches the bill. There’s a smidge of tragedy in how far the mythic hero has fallen, after all, and a contact of dramatic potential relating to his treacherous imprisonment by the Atlantean king, however that’s only an inch of depth we’re speaking about. Aquaman versus Hercules is half-mindless leisure, with the occasional name for cause (“Try to assume! Remember who you were!“) thrown in.
In other circumstances, this encounter with Hercules would naturally and immediately result in a crew-up with Wonder Lady, spanning across two or three issues, maybe calling for an appearance by Poseidon (which throws Atlantean spirituality into panic) and a bit of rivalry between Mera and Diana. And we would nonetheless get all that, in the July launch of Aquaman Annual #2. For now, Parker parks Hercules in a labyrinth and has Arthur abruptly switches gears, readying the title for a Swamp Thing staff-up instead—which is just as exciting, really. Aquaman and Wonder Woman are natural (read: predictable) allies; Aquaman and Swamp Factor are anything but.
A observe on Dr. Evans, “He Who Freed the Gigantomachy,” whose “name will usurp that of Pandora.” As boring a personality as he is, I hope Parker plans to do more with the shortsighted archaeologist. I strongly imagine characters ought to be greater than mere tools to advance a narrative, brought in solely when the author must get himself out of a narrative tight spot. Sadly, Evans is just that. Having used Evans to jumpstart this latest plotline, Parker uses him once more to shelve the Hercules problem until a more handy time, then shelves Evans, too. “[He’s] in his own hell now,” Arthur reassures us, in lieu of an precise decision for the man.
In the meantime, Parker has a pair different plotlines ready and ready in the again for each time Arthur has a spare moment. Triton Base remains an outrageous incursion on Atlantean territory, and inside Dr. Orson is engaging in the same old experimental nonsense: gene-grafts, implausible hybrids, chimeras and the like. Principally, Orson suits right into the mad scientist mold except for the cackling: “I know the analysis council poison ivy red shirt devil of Triton Base will…frown upon the liberties I’ve taken here…but it’s my hope that their concern for safety will win out….when they see the ability we’ve now.”
The poison ivy red shirt devil threats from inside Atlantis haven’t gone away, both, as the tried assassination on Mera proves. Not solely does this incident deliver Tula back into the fold (and reveal her unexpected relationship to Orm), it also affords Mera a possibility to ingratiate herself with the councilors, who are suspiciously nervous after she survives the assault, suggesting that a minimum of considered one of them is presumably concerned. With Mera now formally more in the find out about Atlantean affairs than her husband, there’s a clear division of labor between the couple: she screens the situation under the sea, leaving him free to play ambassador to the surface poison ivy red shirt devil world.
Am I being too arduous on Pelletier That’s the accusation from commenter fletcher shepherd on my evaluation of Aquaman and the Others #1. I take these sorts of critiques critically, because private bias is the bane of all critics. However I don’t see how, towards the likes of J.H. Williams III, Fiona Staples, Javier Pulido, Ivan Reis, Nicola Scott, etc.I can possibly consider Pelletier as something apart from admirably competent, but also untroubled and bland, comparable to his artwork right here. You’re never left in confusion as to what’s occurring, but you’re by no means left with anything visually spectacular either.